Archive for July, 2010

Sometimes I feel like agencies still treat social marketing like it’s a new trend. There’s this childlike excitement about it. Slowly, it’s easing, but not quickly enough. Because with this childlike wonder comes the tendency to covet the social marketing, to carve it out and put it into a little box in our office and … ultimately … to limit its potential.

We even argue about who “owns” it. Is it the PR firm or the digital agency? Even when we know that for years we’ve shared duties (such as traditional agencies taking on PR practices for clients, or PR firms designing websites). While we bicker, specialty shops are springing up, intently focused on securing the business we fight over.

In fact, a recent article in WSJ.com quoted a Domino’s Pizza spokesperson as saying “A lot of companies right now that specialize in PR or advertising are trying to do this on the side….

“On the side?” Yeah. That’s what she said. The kind of firm Domino’s chose? A specialty shop. A sign? You betcha. It’s time to buckle down and get this right. Social marketing may be exciting, and perhaps a little intimidating, but it’s still marketing. And it’s attached to digital. At WhittmanHart, social (in some form) is a part of many of our client relationships; the two aren’t easily separated.

Agencies Need to Be Leaders

Unbelievably, I still hear “What should I do with Facebook?” Why is that? With most other initiatives, the need begets the channel. Yet for some reason, giddiness and maybe even fear of missing out on an opportunity prompts brands to think about moving into Social without really understanding why.  It’s our job to hit the reset button and ask the right questions.

And let’s remember why social marketing has become so important so quickly. The fabric of the consumer-marketer relationship has been altered. Social marketing has become a way to infuse a brand into a buyers life – to channel desire, to add value, to add convenience. These relationships have the potential to improve the longevity and lifetime value of a customer, to evolve products and services and to extend awareness through community. 

Now, I’m not saying that everyone is doing this wrong. What I’m saying is that collectively, we have some work to do. Agencies exist to be expert at our craft. We make educated and strategic recommendations, execute creatively and prove our strength through measurement. Most importantly, our recommendations are typically based on how they fit into a total brand strategy – we compile an understanding of what programs are already running and why. This means that our executions ladder up to the brand’s overarching attributes in order to best meet objectives. Social marketing shouldn’t be treated any differently.

That being said, there is certainly a place for “playing around.” In fact, I’d go so far as to say that I encourage it, particularly with new trends – sampling the waters, having test budgets, etc. But, broadly, the time has come for agencies to get serious about how we use the many pieces that make up Social Marketing.

The past few years have come fast and furious for marketers. With an economic whirlwind came a shift in the way consumers not only spend their money, but the way they interact with brands. Seemingly overnight, new priorities for marketers (and the marketed) surfaced. Only a few years ago, we didn’t care about being friendly with our breakfast cereal. But today, we pursue more meaningful, reciprocal relationships with our brand choices. “Brand experience” has become increasingly important. All of this being true, one group in particular could see significant change in the coming years – online retailing. 

Retailers have made big strides in improving experience – mostly in the area of functionality and enabling purchase. And this is completely appropriate, since people rate User Experience elements higher than most when it comes to ecommerce site expectations. (eMarketer.com

But, what I’m talking about isn’t so much about function. It’s socializing ecommerce. We’re seeing glimmers of this idea with social marketing becoming a common extension of back-to-school programs and in day-to-day brand marketing. And also with efforts to indentify and speak directly to online influencers.  However, what I’m talking about takes this a step further. 

Note: This might not apply in every way to all retailers, but it certainly does for categories like home improvement and fashion.

While our buying patterns have shifted – perhaps we are more contemplative about our purchases and more loyal to transparent brands – human behavior, in general, remains intact. So, just as online reviews and Googling have become an imperative part of making prudent final decisions on a product, we are still guided by our behavior. And for many, shopping is social. This is at least part of why the Shopping Mall was created. It’s the experience. We share. We ask our friends for opinions. And, we take joy in our purchases (and the result of those purchases). For example, we complete a landscaping project in our back yard and post the pictures on Facebook. Or, get the perfect dress for an event with the help of a consultant and friends and get loads of compliments.

How can brands exploit these intrinsic behaviors?

Use Customer Service

Companies like Zappos (yes, another person gushing about Zappos) understand the important role customer service plays in the experience. In fact, as we all know, it is their guiding principle. The spirit of their thinking is brick-and-mortar, not click-and-buy. What will the customer want to see (various angles, videos, how the shoe looks on the foot)? What will make them feel good about their purchase (shipping and return policy, access to friendly representatives)? How do they embrace you as a friend (review the product, give the company feedback)? Most important, they’ve made shopping with them feel good because they’re likeable and they’ve paid attention to what you want.

Determine Social Factors for Your Product

For instance, what makes your customers excited about your products? Turn that excitement into a way to guide the buying process. For example, SwimOutlet.com knows their products are very personal. They also know that people get excited when they find something that improves their performance. So, they make on-site reviews a giant part of their effort. Yes, reviews. Around forever, they play a big role in satisfying the human need to make an informed purchase. I’m a SwimOutlet.com customer. With each purchase, I’ve used their on-site reviews to guide my decision. After a few weeks, I’m always asked to come back to the site and review the product; and again if I haven’t done it after the first request. It’s not pushy. Rather, it’s done in the spirit of giving back to the community; a smart and very profitable gesture.

Leverage Community

Sure, this means initiatives like Facebook and Twitter. But it also means using your site experience (where people purchase). Lowes understands that in their business, people thrive on inspiration and community as a confidence builder to purchase. So, they developed LowesCreativeIdeas.com, where people can get “How-Tos” and share projects. Now, it’s on the right track, but it does have a disconnected feeling from the buying experience. In my mind, the evolution of this concept would integrate experiences with shopping. And this is certainly where it gets tricky.

Engage with Your Audience

While not a retailer themselves, ShopStyle.com has a concept that retailers could learn from. They call themselves “the online equivalent of browsing the aisles of the world’s most fabulous store.” And they embody the notion of bringing the physical shopping experience online. ShopStyle.com is highlighted by their community – a group of people who assemble “stylebooks” that are shared with users. With each assembled outfit, the user can click an item to navigate to purchase options. And these community members can be “followed.” It’s not unusual for a single member to have hundreds of followers. Fashion, in fact, tends to be the most evolved of categories since, fundamentally, it’s such a social thing. I would imagine a lot of idea sharing could happen between fashion and seemingly disconnected categories like electronics and house wares. 

Of course, these ideas are nothing particularly new. But it does capture how important is to be thinking about the impact of the Web combined with our social expectations. Smart retailers will do more than react to immediate demands, they will evolve.

Yesterday, Twitter announced its newest play for makin some bank – “Early Bird.” It’s simple – follow @earlybird on Twitter and you get updates on limited-time, exclusive offers from Twitter advertisers.

It’s a smart play. And, it’s a sensible opportunity for advertisers; one that rewards the community. In fact, in my opinion, this makes a heck of a lot more sense than sponsored tweets and trends.

As an active Twitterer, I’m actually excited about this. It’s a little “Woot-ish.” And that’s a good thing. If they do this the way users are likely expecting (at the time of this post, they already have well over 15,000 followers – with just ONE tweet), then it has all the right pieces and parts. It’s community driven. It’s exclusive. It’s limited- time. And, on the advertiser side, they have control over the deals and access to a passionate community. 

At least at first thought, the only way I see this flopping is if Twitter takes on crappy offers. But, they are asking for ideas for how they decide on offers.

Read more: 

As of today, I’m one of the thousands of followers looking forward to seeing where this goes …

Something about the warm sunshine (and kids at their grandparents) makes me read more. Perhaps you too. So, in tribute the glowing orb in the sky and the greatness that is working in the digital space, I have assembled a Summer Reading list. It’s compiled by recommendations from the some of the great minds in our agency – and covers everything from customer service to creativity.

Enjoy! (Links take you to Amazon). And, if you’ve read any of these books – or plan to – please report back; I’d love to here your thoughts.

Carol Setter

I just recently read How Brands Become Icons: The Principles of Cultural Branding by Douglas B. Holt. Now I’m reading a very interesting book,  The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains by Nicholas Carr

Chip Weinstein

It’s old school, but Where the Suckers Moon: The Life and Death of an Advertising Campaign by Randall Rothenberg is still the greatest look at a pitch from the inside. And the author now runs the IAB. 

Sheree Hill

Zac Rybacki

A few months ago, I read The Checklist Manifesto: How to Get Things Right by Atul Gawande. While it deals mainly the complex nature of modern medicine he makes great analogies to other very complex environments like high rise construction. Very easy to relate back to our business and in my opinion a great read for all project managers. 

Todd Levy

I would definitely recommend Rework by Jason Fried, and David Heinemeier Hansson from (Chicago’s own) 37signals.  Here’s a quick review from Seth Godin…

“This book will make you uncomfortable.
Depending on what you do all day, it might make you extremely uncomfortable.
That’s a very good thing, because you deserve it. We all do.”

 Also, a great customer service book is Zingerman’s Guide to Giving Great Service by Ari Weinzweig.

Kevin French

I can vouch for Rework.  Very good read.  I also just read Delivering Happiness: A Path to Profits, Passion, and Purpose from the CEO of Zappos, Tony Hsieh.  It’s all about being in the business of customer service and gives a good perspective on business in general and client services.

Paul Murray

I’ll second Rework, still relevant and a fantastic book. Also, I think Seth Godin’s Linchpin: Are You Indispensable? is well worth mentioning.

Joe Mastrangelo

Check out these books:

Brian Addison

A few I like are …

The rumors continue to swirl about Google Me, a Google-blended competitor to Facebook. At this point, it’s speculation if this undertaking is real – the rumor was began by a single tweet from Digg co-founder Kevin Rose, which was promptly deleted; but lived long enough to send the tech community into a frenzy. There have been no denials from Google at this point and –  let’s be real -  it is a logical business move if they can nail it.

It’s a rumor hard to dispel when Google themself has publically “declared war” on their collective social efforts. Google’s Joseph Smarr, who was tapped to lead this effort said “Google’s decided that social is one of its big focuses for 2010, and it’s very natural, as the Web is going social.”

Wait, doesn’t Google already have a social network? Uh, yeah. Okurt. This was their attempt back in 2004. It never really took off in the US, but Brazil loves it.  If Google Me is for real, then it will have to outdo that attempt.  

All of this said, if Google Me does surface as reality, I’m skeptical. Perhaps it was the sizzle and fizzle of Google Buzz, but I’m not holding my breath. It isn’t the privacy debacle that put me off; it just didn’t work for me. And it took no time at all to discover it wasn’t going to. It was too closely tied to Google itself, requiring a Google email address or ID.

To boot, one can’t ignore the obvious and continued success of Facebook.com. Despite their own privacy issues, they are thriving. There are few people I interact with on a daily basis that don’t have an account – which they use with frequency. (well, not my mom who, regrettably, cannot even find the address bar in a browser window)

Wired.com has a great article on this topic.  

A Google Facebook clone that runs on open standards including XMPP and the portable OpenID system — which lets people use one trusted password on multiple sites (including Gmail) — might be enough, over time, to steal users from Facebook. It would let you bring all of your personal data with you when you leave a network with just a few clicks, porting it to a new service in minutes without losing anything and let you maintain one profile for multiple services. Both of these are impossible with Facebook.

“The only way Google could put a dent into Facebook is to go after it the same way it’s gone after Microsoft — open and free with no centralized data collection and a decision that it doesn’t have to own your data,” suggested Wired.com staff writer Ryan Singel as we discussed this issue. “Sure, Google will closely tie in a bunch of its own products, but it can’t go the Buzz way and require you to have a Google ID or Gmail address.”

 Openness of the platform may in fact determine its success. And so, we wait.