Archive for October, 2009

This past Spring my best friend and I went to Argentina to celebrate my 30th birthday. From the Iguazu Falls to the foothills of the Andes in Bariloche, we explored some of the most amazing places. Things that I will never forget. You’d think that I would of taken 100’s of pictures; especially since we both had our nice Nikon and Canon digital cameras. I think we took 30 between the both of us. Instead we captured the whole experience on my FlipHD video camera. With it being the size of an iPod and holding 60 minutes of footage before offloading by USB straight to my computer—it was a no brainer. We uploaded videos each day to our Facebook pages allowing our friends to really share in the experience with us at a whole other level. I would constantly hear things like “I feel like we are there with you.” Which is not something you often hear about a photograph. Video breaks through that wall and I think it will be hard to go back. Since we were gone for a little more than three weeks we couldn’t really just “walk away” from our lives at home. But video helped us with that too. My friend would communicate daily with his girlfriend using video chat/ Skype and I was using it to give my editor notes on a project we were finishing. Now I know we could of used other methods to communicate but I think my buddy’s girlfriend thought the “I love yous,” were more impactful as she watched him say it (even if she had to deal with seeing me in the background as I sat on the couch drinking beers).

Check out the amazing Iguazu Falls:

Iguazu Falls Video

Now I rarely leave my house without my flip. But even if I don’t have it, most of the accessories I carry with me daily (phone, iPod) capture video. And I also find myself communicating more and more using video chat because hearing someone’s voice or typing just isn’t enough.

While writing this blog I realized it’s my first ever “written” blog entry ever. No wonder it took me so long. I should of just pulled out my flip.

One of the hottest trends in interactive has been Augmented Reality and marketers are scrambling to figure out how to use it without falling into the “me too” category.  AR is nothing new and has been around since the early 90’s.  You may not have realized it but you have been experiencing AR in a variety of ways for some time now. It might surprise you but the yellow “first down” line we see on TV watching a football game is in-fact a form of AR.  The technology broke though into main stream when it became possible to produce AR experiences in Adobe Flash, providing an unmatched user base (installed on 99% of all internet-enabled desktops) as apposed to developing proprietary plug-ins.

Augmented Reality is based on image processing and the ability to process a live video feed, such as from your webcam, and detect objects within the video.  In this instance it is detecting a marker, typically a black square with a white pattern inside of it.  The distortion of the marker within the video image, depending on how you are holding it, creates 3D camera information that can be applied to a 3D model.   Other image processing techniques such as motion detection, facial recognition, optical tracking can be combined together to create meaningful interactive experiences. Utilize GPS to provide location awareness to your functionality and now you’ve got something. CPG, retail, social and gaming can all benefit greatly from these capabilities.

Pushing the limitations of AR within Flash is a tangled web because of memory consumption and image processing. Aside from performance why and when to use AR is a larger question, technology will always get better but ideas will stand the test of time. There are some great AR examples out there.  We believe the work we did for Lucas Arts on www.jointheclonewars.com is obviously a natural fit and leverages AR to drive engagement allowing for a stronger connection with the brand. I know this Star Wars fan boy was gitty with excitement as I ran to the printer.  Finding the right balance between utility, brand fit, engagement, performance and entertainment is the challenge as we all move forward.

whiBlog_yodaAR

Marshall McLuhan once said “We drive into the future using only our rearview mirror” and as a side note it’s interesting to point out that most AR experiences somehow try to take an artifact from our reality and virtualizes it. For example this is a new take at a T-Shirt design fitting room. Quite a bit of AR is for novelty and that’s ok, embracing technology is part of what we do as humans, but one example of AR that really sticks out as a useful tool is the Box Simulator for the US Postal Service.

whiBlog_uspsAR

It is a very exciting time to see where this AR train goes. With increasing support and interest in creating the applications the demand for useful compelling AR experiences is going to go up.

However, it’s going to require more lustrous graphic processing, mobile availability and most importantly engaging concepts. All in due time.

Statistics support using social in your marketing mix, but how?

Statistics support using social in your marketing mix, but how?

Last week, I gave a presentation on “Driving In-Store Sales through Social Media” at the In-Store Marketing Expo in Chicago. After taking the crowd through our Sears Arrive Lounge and Mountain Dew DEWmocracy case studies, I was ready for questions.

I was surprised that the majority of the questions were about social media basics and how to integrate social not only into a company’s larger digital plans, but also into the greater marketing mix. So many marketers feel paralyzed by social media. They’re behind the eight ball and they don’t know how to get ahead. What’s worse, many marketers think that consumers are ahead. I argue that’s only because we as marketers and agencies are letting them get ahead.

Social media must be taken out of the context of traditional marketing campaigns and move into the context of customer relationship management. How will you keep your finger on the pulse of your consumers on an ongoing basis?

We’ve long known that digital communications allow people to immediately take action when they hear a message. The problem is most marketers are ignoring the consumer response. Now more than ever, we must pay attention to that action, and listen to the response. Yet we continue to be driven by the push mentality—pushing messages out to consumers.

For example, one of our clients saw an uptick in online sales, so they were ready to move all communications online and decrease their in-store presence. By doing Personas and truly understanding the customer’s online behavior, we found that people were actually using the store as an important information-gathering tool before making purchasing decisions. Three of the four Personas used both in-store and online tools to influence their purchase. You have to have both. If we wouldn’t have worked with our client to really get in there and understand how the consumer was using digital, we would have ignored a very important part of the purchasing decision. Marketers must appreciate that the true aspect of digital is multi-way communication. And they must learn how to capitalize on that.

For me, one of the most important benefits of social media for the marketer is knowledge gathering. Listen to what the consumer is saying, but then use that knowledge to speak to the consumer in a better, more informed way.

Immersing users in competitive game play increased brand interest

Immersing users in competitive game play increased brand interest

The DEWmocracy campaign we presented at the conference didn’t start as a social media campaign. Instead we were approached with a business problem—how does Mountain Dew come up with its next flavor? The process was taking too much time in R&D, and the client needed a different solution. So we looked at the Millennial target and their relationship with technology. We knew the target would want to be a part of the product development process. You couldn’t just shove a new flavor in front of them and expect them to embrace it, so we decided to build an online game and social network where consumers could actually create and then campaign for the next flavor of Mountain Dew. Users eventually aligned behind three top drink choices, formed teams and collectively worked to enhance each component of their drink candidates to make them stronger and more appealing to the public. When the game closed in January 2008, campaigning for the three finalized drink creations began. Campaigning ended in June, and Americans voted to ultimately determine the fate of the next Mountain Dew from July through August 2008. Based on our recommendation—knowing that the target audience would want to see, touch and feel the product—Mountain Dew actually sold the three contending flavors in stores. At the end of August, Voltage was declared the winner, and the new flavor hit stores that November.

The DEWmocrac voting site included assets to let users evangelize

The DEWmocrac voting site included assets to let users evangelize

DEWmocracy had an enormous participation rate of 1.5 million users, with numbers increasing 5-10% every few days. The average time spent per user on DEWmocracy was an astonishing 27 minutes. For reference, reaching just a mere five minutes on a brand website is an amazing feat. DEWmocracy has certainly brought forth an experience that users were interested in engaging with for extended periods of time, over the course of many weeks.

Why was it so successful? Because we listened to the target and engaged in a dialogue. We let them become part of the process. And organizationally, we didn’t pigeonhole social media in the marketing department. Instead we worked with

Top 3 user-generated flavors were sold and encouraged more social activity

Top 3 user-generated flavors were sold and encouraged more social activity

R&D, marketing, packaging, merchandising and the in-store team. The entire organization embraced the campaign, and they were flexible enough to listen to what their consumers were telling them.

At the end of the day, my lesson to the conference attendees and any marketer entering or living in the social media space is that we as agencies and marketers need to use all of our resources and mediums (social included) to speak to, listen to and engage with our consumers in order to stay one step ahead of them.

I’m happy to discuss social media, in general, and also how it can drive in-store sales. I’d love to hear about the social media challenges you’re facing. Feel free to email me at: sbava@whittmanhart.com

recovery.gov vs. recovery.com

recovery.gov vs. recovery.com

So here’s an interesting scenario I suspect may be more common than I care to think. I recently read about how Onvia has had success creating a very useful site that tracks government stimulus monies as they flow from Washington to individual states to counties and communities. It’s essentially a toll for contractors and others who are looking to bid on these government projects. They’ve done a nice job of creating a clean visual interface and interaction design allowing anyone to drill into a community and see what projects are on the docket and there providing the correlating information to respond to an RFP or RFI. They’ve even enabled some nice social widgets (list) facilitating dialogue within the site. All great stuff.

At the same time our federal government has commissioned a similar site, recovery.gov. Their mission almost identical “…provide unprecedented transparency about how Recovery funds are being used…” This site also does a pretty solid job of synthesizing boat loads of data into a relatively easy to use interface.

social tool on recovery.com

social tool on recovery.com

I think there are at least two areas where they really differ. First, Onvia seemed to find a way to enable some dialogue. With their approach you can comment on projects and vote on projects you think are most and least worthwhile. You can also follow changes and updates to recovery.com via their Twitter account. And they employ a full set of “share” functionality via AddThis. Second, I’m pretty sure it didn’t cost Onvia anywhere near $18M to put this together.

OK, I’m not one of those people who want to privatize everything our government does, and frankly can be quite good at. Don’t want a private solution to military, school, etc. But $18M is a lot of Recovery for a website.

Here’s a suggestion. We spend a few thousand coming up with a really great piece of copy that sets the stage for the new recover.gov.

“Thanks for visiting recovery.gov. In an effort to bring the public the best access to information on how Recovery money is being spent we have partnered with Oniva who has put together a fantastic solution that accomplishes everything we want to accomplish and then some. We’ve decided to support their efforts to ensure recovery.com stay up to date for the next three years. The remaining $17.5M previously allocated to making this experience more like theirs has been redirected to other projects.

>> Click Here for Recovery.com

The lesson is one we’ve been talking to clients about for years “if it already exists, you may do better leveraging it vs. building it”.

I remember how my dad would always be reminding me to pay attention – like when I’d miss a tennis ball in practice or misspell the capitol of Honduras – and to be honest, I should have paid more attention to his advice at the time. Paying attention can mean the difference between success and failure in most endeavors. If Woody Allen’s famous line, “80% of life is just showing up” is true, then paying attention accounts for at least 10% of the rest.

Business Intelligence and Analytics is on my mind everyday and a part of every conversation with our clients.  As a result, we continue to focus on what the critical role of BI really is, and how it is best employed to enhance business. What a surprise: It’s about paying attention.

I have yet to encounter an organization – large or small – that is completely comfortable with their own ability to understand their customers, measure and attribute success and failure, or reliably predict business outcomes from promotional activities. It’s not for lack of interest or intellect. Some of the smartest and most engaged executives are among those who readily admit to an inability to make sense of all the data their organizations create. They long for clear, actionable information to help them succeed.mediaPlan_small

As we gain ever more ways to interact with customers, the amount of data we can harvest grows; and the challenge of making sense of all the information multiplies. Twenty years ago, it was hard enough to measure the impact of a mail shot when broadcast and print were the only other drivers. With the explosion of new communication channels – online, email, social, mobile – and the shift from outbound to interactive communication, marketers are busier than ever trying to capitalize on all the possibilities. In the process of all this frenetic activity, we aren’t always able to pay attention to how we measure and act upon results. We are awash in an ocean of data, and John Wannamaker’s famous complaint about not knowing which half of his advertising is wasted is still the risk facing most organizations.

The good news is that we marketers now have good tools to harvest data, and the opportunity to note and pay attention to the things that impact success. This is where Business Intelligence adds value. BI allows us to fail or learn fast; but only if we pay attention. By making BI a central component of each campaign, establishing clear connections between business goals and success metrics, and refusing to execute any activity that cannot be measured, we can reduce waste and improve our ability to adjust and improve performance.

Organizations need to help in order for BI to be most effective. How?…by paying attention. BI is not just a stack of incomprehensible charts and graphs that grow like sedimentary rock on the marketers’ shelves or sit heavy in unopened emails. Rather, it is a discipline that converts data into knowledge and knowledge into actionable insights and recommendations. Embracing BI as an integral part of an organization’s growth and operations and working with BI resources to understand and refine what is delivered will ensure everyone is paying attention to the right stuff, and limit the distraction of irrelevant data. Like so many things in life, what you get out of it depends on what you put in. Pay attention to how and what you need to measure and the result will be knowledge worth much more than you’ve paid.

More and more I notice that friends of mine are involving their children—even ones yet to make their life debut—in social network sites that they, as adults, frequent. Facebook, Flickr, YouTube, Twitter…you name it, if it’s a website and it has social component to it and if you have kids, chances are you are doing it, too.

Picture 3 Picture 5

Picture 4 Picture 2

But that’s okay. Just learn to accept that your children are on the cusp of being more popular (and smarter) than you; and their circle of friends, and friends’ friends, and friends’ friends’ friends will one day destroy—in sheer numbers—your rather tiny group of friends, colleagues and acquaintances. By the way, book club meets at my house this week. Exactly.

So, social media and kids. What does it mean? A lot of things, actually. The ever-evolving presence of children in social media channels has impacted the way we perceive these online channels in various ways. For example, privacy for children. Facebook doesn’t allow children under 13 to have their own profile, period. Which means you cannot create a profile for them anymore—well, you can, but once the privacy cops figure it out, Facebook will delete your child’s profile immediately, with no warning.

But check this out: Circle of Moms. It’s a parenting site that has an application within Facebook where moms can create individual profile pages for each of their children. From there, moms can have fun updating their child’s status, upload photos and start connecting their children with siblings, family members and others. Here’s a look at my son’s profile.

soren com profile

Another way we see the impact of social media on children and their parents is the way moms and dads are scooping up domain names for their young ones. The phrase ‘domain squatting’ comes to mind; however, is it really squatting if your intention is to hand over the URL reigns to your child once he/she is old enough? Chances are you are not banking on profiting from a few domains you have set aside for your children.

Then there’s Flickr, Twitter, YouTube…the list just gets bigger by the day as new social networks spawn and people continue to make babies. I myself am guilty of creating a Flickr and YouTube account for my 4-year old daughter. Really, all I did was name the accounts after her and feature content that involves her romping around our house, saying crazy things like “Daddy, who painted eyes on us?” and tackling an unsuspecting boy at our local Gymboree. Again, this is a great way to aggregate pictures and videos of your children—plus, with the ‘commenting’ functionality on social media sites, you capture sentiments from loved ones regardless of where they live. They do it online, on their time, and it’s real (versus a boilerplate greeting card or something  like that).

Of course, though, as parents continue to involve their children in their own social media endeavors, the more we’ll hear the divide over what’s appropriate and when parents are simply going too far. For example, should you have a separate Twitter account for you child, or could you just broadcast to your followers what your son is blurting out via your Twitter account? Is one YouTube account sufficient for the entire family or is it necessary for Junior and little Jane to have their very own pages, all wallpapered out with their favorite colors and patterns?

Personally, I say, “Why not?” If the technology is there and you are using good judgment and your intention is to connect your children with family and friends in an immediate, engaging way, then go for it. It sure beats calling grandma in Phoenix and holding the telephone up to my daughter’s mouth hoping she’ll say something cute on the spot. Instead, grandma can check out YouTube to see a ton of video of my daugher in all her goofy glory. Plus, once you’ve established a social network for your child via Facebook, for example, you begin making more connections with parents who may have things in common with you and have similar parenting philosophies—then, within the parameters of that site, you can exchange parenting tips/advice with other moms and dads, instead of scouring the Internet for sites that may not be credible or interesting.

Finally, as marketers and parents of young children, we are already immersing our children in the world of social media, and there’s no doubt that how they perceive and utilize social media as they maneuver through adolescence and adulthood will be more sophisticated and effective in both their personal and professional lives. Just imageine how they’ll use Facebook and Twitter as a marketing tool as they join the ranks of strategists, interaction designers and technologists of their generation. That is, if Facebook and Twitter are still household names.

So, what do you think? Are you for social media and kids, or do you think it’s just too much too soon for parents to get their kids involved?

Post a comment to share your thoughts.